This site is intended to educate the public on broad social, political and economic issues affecting low-income families. Comments made by readers herein do not represent the views or positions of the Marguerite Casey Foundation or Equal Voice, America’s Family Story, and do not constitute a recommendation for or against any specific candidate, legislation, or legislative proposal.

Users must refrain from making or posting comments that may constitute or could be viewed as lobbying or political campaigning under the U.S. federal tax laws. In addition, users must refrain from making or posting vulgar, obscene, threatening or abusive comments on this site. The website moderator reserves the right in its sole discretion, but not the responsibility, to delete or edit any user submission to this site, and/or to bar the participation by anyone who it reasonably believes to have violated these principles. Complete rules of conduct for this site are contained in the Term of Use

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Who’s unemployed and who votes – note the connection

You can’t help noticing that tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans are commanding far more political attention than the continued dirge of miserable employment figures, despite the fact that 2 million people recently faced being cut from unemployment assistance. Ezra Klein of the Washington Post offers one reason for this disconnect.

He paired the unemployment of high school and college graduates with their voting rates in the most recent election and found this:


In short: People with a high school diploma or less are struggling with massive rates of unemployment, but they don't turn out to vote in nearly the numbers as those with a college education. On the flip-side, though a quarter of Americans have college diplomas, they made up 51 percent of the electorate in 2010. And in that group, the unemployment rate is only about 5 percent. So if you believe that politicians actually answer to those who vote, their current obsessions may make a little more sense.

No comments: