This site is intended to educate the public on broad social, political and economic issues affecting low-income families. Comments made by readers herein do not represent the views or positions of the Marguerite Casey Foundation or Equal Voice, America’s Family Story, and do not constitute a recommendation for or against any specific candidate, legislation, or legislative proposal.

Users must refrain from making or posting comments that may constitute or could be viewed as lobbying or political campaigning under the U.S. federal tax laws. In addition, users must refrain from making or posting vulgar, obscene, threatening or abusive comments on this site. The website moderator reserves the right in its sole discretion, but not the responsibility, to delete or edit any user submission to this site, and/or to bar the participation by anyone who it reasonably believes to have violated these principles. Complete rules of conduct for this site are contained in the Term of Use

Friday, July 17, 2009

Getting Rid of Summer Vacation?


One of those was Conor Clarke’s essay last month on the Web site of The Atlantic, titled “Why We Should Get Rid of Summer Vacation.” He was not talking about mine, but rather my children’s — and the fact that three months off every year is a schedule that makes less sense in a modern world than in the agrarian (and unairconditioned) one in which it was first created.

His arguments, he notes, are familiar ones. They come up every year at this time: Students — particularly those at most educational risk — backslide during the summer. Parents need to spend and scramble to find child care. Wealthier families can afford safe, stimulating ways for children to spend the empty days, but lower income families often can not. And the yearly pause means American students lag behind much of the Western world in the number of days they spend in school.

Read More

No comments: